Leadership and Followership are the two sides of the
same coin. Followers play a very important role in organizational
growth just as Leaders do. Understanding your leadership style makes it equally important to know
who your followers are.
This post and the video will give an interesting insight into the "Art of
Followership."
Adapted from the book - "The Art of Followership: How Great Followers Create Great Leaders and Organizations" talks about five basic styles of Followership:
The sheep. Sheep are passive and look to the leader to do the thinking for them and to motivate them. If you are the boss and in your car on the way to work, and you’re thinking about what you’re going to get your workers to do and how you’re going to do that, then you’re dealing with sheep.
The yes-people. Yes-people are positive, always on the leader’s side, but still looking to the leader for the thinking, the direction, the vision. If the leader asks them to do something, they’ve got the energy, and they’ll go forward with it.When they finish that task, they’ll come back to the leader, asking, “What do you want me to do next?” However, yes-people don’t see themselves this way. One of the things I've learned is that the different styles of followers will almost always put a positive spin on their style. Yes-people will say, “I’m a doer; that’s my job.
The boss gets paid to think, and I’m the one who does the work.” But the rest of us would say there’s more to being a good follower than simply doing.
The alienated. Alienated followers think for themselves, but have a lot of negative energy. Every time the leader or organization tries to move forward, these are the ones who have ten reasons why the leader or organization shouldn't. They are not coming up with the next solution, but are skeptical, cynical about the current plan of action. They have energy, they can think for themselves, they can be smart. But they are not moving in a positive direction. However, they see themselves as the mavericks, the only people in the organization who have the guts to stand up to the boss.
The pragmatics. Pragmatics sit on the fence and see which way the wind blows. Once they see where things are headed, they’ll get on board. They’ll never be the first on board, but they will never let the leader or organization leave The Art of Followership without them. They see themselves as preservers of the status quo. Their internal dialogue goes something like this: “If I got all excited every time there was a new leader or a change of direction, my wheels would be spinning constantly. Leaders come and go. New visions come and go. If I just sit here and wait it out, I won’t have to do all that work.” So they do what they must to survive, but wait it out until the storms of change blow over.
The star followers. Star followers think for themselves, are very active, and have very positive energy. They do not accept the leader’s decision without their own independent evaluation of its soundness. If they agree with the leader, they give full support. If they disagree, they challenge the leader, offering constructive alternatives that will help the leader and organization get where they want to go. Some people view these people as really “leaders in disguise,” but this is basically because those people have a hard time accepting that followers can display such independence and positive behavior. Star followers are often referred to as “my right-hand person” or my “go-to person.”
So this was the basic model I read and found relevant to understand followership styles. It offered me a framework to think about the type of behavior that led to all the negative stereotypes, as well as to conceive of the positive followership that rarely got mentioned. If you want to explore to explore the full reality of how people follow it is important to study their motivations and situations that determine their followership behavior. Can a person be a star follower in one situation and an alienated follower in another situation? Why do people adopt a particular style? Why would someone end up as a pragmatic follower? What conditions might lead to that? Are there ways to help people move toward a chosen style?
Inviting comments to hack the followership space to make us better leaders!

